<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Fox Leading Broncos To Victories, Coach Of The Year Talk Progresses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/12/05/john-fox-leading-broncos-to-victories-coach-of-the-year-talk-progresses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/12/05/john-fox-leading-broncos-to-victories-coach-of-the-year-talk-progresses/</link>
	<description>A Denver Broncos Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 06:53:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RyanVest</title>
		<link>http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/12/05/john-fox-leading-broncos-to-victories-coach-of-the-year-talk-progresses/comment-page-1/#comment-1597404</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanVest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://predominantlyorange.com/?p=10283#comment-1597404</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s a great personality in interview and seems to be a likeable guy, but I still wonder about how good John Fox really is.

 

I feel like the flip between the poor first half offense and great second half offense has just as much to do with the play calling as it does to do with Tebow.  Its like in the first half or three quarters its only the completely the same McGahee run option that becomes so obvious it gets stopped easily, and never allows Tebow to get in a rythem passing. Then when he actually lets Tebow to start throwing because there simply isn&#039;t enough time left to risk play time on 90% runs, Tebow gets in a rythem, the play calling is more standard and balanced, and boom we have a come from behind victory.  At least that&#039;s how it&#039;s been since KC.  I literally counted only 2 passes past the line of scrimmage in the first half against the Vikings.

 

You know how people say the &quot;defense is winning these games despite Tebow&quot;?  I almost want to say the defense is winning despite Fox, but because the defense is also under Fox&#039;s control so you really can&#039;t complain much.

 

In the end he just wins, so as long as that continues you can call him whatever you want.  It&#039;d actually be almost evil genious if having a horrible play calling in the first half is only to get them in a lull for absolute ownage second half.

 

Of course there&#039;s also the fact that he was practically proven wrong in his decision to go with Orton despite tons of people calling him out on it before the season started but i guess that&#039;s still a debate to this day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s a great personality in interview and seems to be a likeable guy, but I still wonder about how good John Fox really is.</p>
<p>I feel like the flip between the poor first half offense and great second half offense has just as much to do with the play calling as it does to do with Tebow.  Its like in the first half or three quarters its only the completely the same McGahee run option that becomes so obvious it gets stopped easily, and never allows Tebow to get in a rythem passing. Then when he actually lets Tebow to start throwing because there simply isn&#8217;t enough time left to risk play time on 90% runs, Tebow gets in a rythem, the play calling is more standard and balanced, and boom we have a come from behind victory.  At least that&#8217;s how it&#8217;s been since KC.  I literally counted only 2 passes past the line of scrimmage in the first half against the Vikings.</p>
<p>You know how people say the &#8220;defense is winning these games despite Tebow&#8221;?  I almost want to say the defense is winning despite Fox, but because the defense is also under Fox&#8217;s control so you really can&#8217;t complain much.</p>
<p>In the end he just wins, so as long as that continues you can call him whatever you want.  It&#8217;d actually be almost evil genious if having a horrible play calling in the first half is only to get them in a lull for absolute ownage second half.</p>
<p>Of course there&#8217;s also the fact that he was practically proven wrong in his decision to go with Orton despite tons of people calling him out on it before the season started but i guess that&#8217;s still a debate to this day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RyanVest</title>
		<link>http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/12/05/john-fox-leading-broncos-to-victories-coach-of-the-year-talk-progresses/comment-page-1/#comment-5780</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanVest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://predominantlyorange.com/?p=10283#comment-5780</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s a great personality in interview and seems to be a likeable guy, but I still wonder about how good John Fox really is.

 

I feel like the flip between the poor first half offense and great second half offense has just as much to do with the play calling as it does to do with Tebow.  Its like in the first half or three quarters its only the completely the same McGahee run option that becomes so obvious it gets stopped easily, and never allows Tebow to get in a rythem passing. Then when he actually lets Tebow to start throwing because there simply isn&#039;t enough time left to risk play time on 90% runs, Tebow gets in a rythem, the play calling is more standard and balanced, and boom we have a come from behind victory.  At least that&#039;s how it&#039;s been since KC.  I literally counted only 2 passes past the line of scrimmage in the first half against the Vikings.

 

You know how people say the &quot;defense is winning these games despite Tebow&quot;?  I almost want to say the defense is winning despite Fox, but because the defense is also under Fox&#039;s control so you really can&#039;t complain much.

 

In the end he just wins, so as long as that continues you can call him whatever you want.  It&#039;d actually be almost evil genious if having a horrible play calling in the first half is only to get them in a lull for absolute ownage second half.

 

Of course there&#039;s also the fact that he was practically proven wrong in his decision to go with Orton despite tons of people calling him out on it before the season started but i guess that&#039;s still a debate to this day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s a great personality in interview and seems to be a likeable guy, but I still wonder about how good John Fox really is.</p>
<p>I feel like the flip between the poor first half offense and great second half offense has just as much to do with the play calling as it does to do with Tebow.  Its like in the first half or three quarters its only the completely the same McGahee run option that becomes so obvious it gets stopped easily, and never allows Tebow to get in a rythem passing. Then when he actually lets Tebow to start throwing because there simply isn&#8217;t enough time left to risk play time on 90% runs, Tebow gets in a rythem, the play calling is more standard and balanced, and boom we have a come from behind victory.  At least that&#8217;s how it&#8217;s been since KC.  I literally counted only 2 passes past the line of scrimmage in the first half against the Vikings.</p>
<p>You know how people say the &#8220;defense is winning these games despite Tebow&#8221;?  I almost want to say the defense is winning despite Fox, but because the defense is also under Fox&#8217;s control so you really can&#8217;t complain much.</p>
<p>In the end he just wins, so as long as that continues you can call him whatever you want.  It&#8217;d actually be almost evil genious if having a horrible play calling in the first half is only to get them in a lull for absolute ownage second half.</p>
<p>Of course there&#8217;s also the fact that he was practically proven wrong in his decision to go with Orton despite tons of people calling him out on it before the season started but i guess that&#8217;s still a debate to this day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loganberry</title>
		<link>http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/12/05/john-fox-leading-broncos-to-victories-coach-of-the-year-talk-progresses/comment-page-1/#comment-1597403</link>
		<dc:creator>loganberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://predominantlyorange.com/?p=10283#comment-1597403</guid>
		<description>He seems like a great guy and I&#039;m glad he&#039;s here but he&#039;s not the reason we are winning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He seems like a great guy and I&#8217;m glad he&#8217;s here but he&#8217;s not the reason we are winning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 23/30 queries in 0.081 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 316/343 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: predominantlyorange.com @ 2013-05-20 19:32:56 by W3 Total Cache -->