<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Broncos&#8217; Draft Darts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/02/02/the-broncos-draft-darts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/02/02/the-broncos-draft-darts/</link>
	<description>A Denver Broncos Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 06:53:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/02/02/the-broncos-draft-darts/comment-page-1/#comment-4372</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://predominantlyorange.com/?p=4525#comment-4372</guid>
		<description>Do you think that Bowers would be a good 2nd pick? I love Peterson, but I also think Bowers could show immediate impact. A couple of decent CBs will be free agents (after the new CBA is signed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that Bowers would be a good 2nd pick? I love Peterson, but I also think Bowers could show immediate impact. A couple of decent CBs will be free agents (after the new CBA is signed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Graham</title>
		<link>http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/02/02/the-broncos-draft-darts/comment-page-1/#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>David Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://predominantlyorange.com/?p=4525#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>@arap Good points. My thoughts:

-I&#039;m not sure where your points system comes from, but I think it&#039;s important to remember that the second pick commands a lot of money. Even if the Broncos give up some &quot;points&quot;, having money available to sign free agents (if and when the CBA gets signed) is more critical, IMO.

-I&#039;m not saying we dismantle the defense, and neither are the Broncos. Keeping OC Mike McCoy on means that Fox likely feels the same way. But Fox ran a run-heavy offense in Carolina and will likely push a similar agenda here. Thus, the Broncos don&#039;t need a lot of WR&#039;s for spread sets of the caliber that they have right now. A trade here makes sense and can be done without dismantling the team. Teams like San Francisco and St. Louis could use Gaffney and could give up a 4th round pick, although that may be a stretch.

-We need almost every defensive position. I would agree that the defensive line should be a focus, but that doesn&#039;t mean the Broncos shouldn&#039;t draft defensive backs. If Peterson is the best defensive player on the board, it makes sense to grab him, especially if Fairley is gone.

Thanks again for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@arap Good points. My thoughts:</p>
<p>-I&#8217;m not sure where your points system comes from, but I think it&#8217;s important to remember that the second pick commands a lot of money. Even if the Broncos give up some &#8220;points&#8221;, having money available to sign free agents (if and when the CBA gets signed) is more critical, IMO.</p>
<p>-I&#8217;m not saying we dismantle the defense, and neither are the Broncos. Keeping OC Mike McCoy on means that Fox likely feels the same way. But Fox ran a run-heavy offense in Carolina and will likely push a similar agenda here. Thus, the Broncos don&#8217;t need a lot of WR&#8217;s for spread sets of the caliber that they have right now. A trade here makes sense and can be done without dismantling the team. Teams like San Francisco and St. Louis could use Gaffney and could give up a 4th round pick, although that may be a stretch.</p>
<p>-We need almost every defensive position. I would agree that the defensive line should be a focus, but that doesn&#8217;t mean the Broncos shouldn&#8217;t draft defensive backs. If Peterson is the best defensive player on the board, it makes sense to grab him, especially if Fairley is gone.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arap</title>
		<link>http://predominantlyorange.com/2011/02/02/the-broncos-draft-darts/comment-page-1/#comment-4283</link>
		<dc:creator>arap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://predominantlyorange.com/?p=4525#comment-4283</guid>
		<description>man im glad your not the GM

the 2nd pick has a value of 2600 points...the lions 13th  pick 1150...the lions 2nd 460....leaving us with a draft  board loss of 690 points

then  how about we keep our offfensive players and focus on defense in the draft...josh  traded or lost  good offensive talent and instead of drafting  heavey def...had to draft  replacements

consider llyod and thomas wide...and decker and royal  splitting the slot...or both in a 4  wr set

gaffney  we can get rid of...although a 4th  is a reach

and why  woould we draft  peterson anyway?...even the best DB&#039;s wil get beat if the front line dont get  pressure...peterson  will be a great player no  doubt...but we need a dline to contend...build the trench players and you  can  get away  with a average secondary...no dline and even  the best secondary  will  fail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man im glad your not the GM</p>
<p>the 2nd pick has a value of 2600 points&#8230;the lions 13th  pick 1150&#8230;the lions 2nd 460&#8230;.leaving us with a draft  board loss of 690 points</p>
<p>then  how about we keep our offfensive players and focus on defense in the draft&#8230;josh  traded or lost  good offensive talent and instead of drafting  heavey def&#8230;had to draft  replacements</p>
<p>consider llyod and thomas wide&#8230;and decker and royal  splitting the slot&#8230;or both in a 4  wr set</p>
<p>gaffney  we can get rid of&#8230;although a 4th  is a reach</p>
<p>and why  woould we draft  peterson anyway?&#8230;even the best DB&#8217;s wil get beat if the front line dont get  pressure&#8230;peterson  will be a great player no  doubt&#8230;but we need a dline to contend&#8230;build the trench players and you  can  get away  with a average secondary&#8230;no dline and even  the best secondary  will  fail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 6/13 queries in 0.038 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 313/317 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: predominantlyorange.com @ 2013-05-19 10:33:26 by W3 Total Cache -->